Add model card with YAML metadata
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
language:
|
| 3 |
+
- en
|
| 4 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
| 5 |
+
tags:
|
| 6 |
+
- research-paper
|
| 7 |
+
- formal-verification
|
| 8 |
+
- cryptography
|
| 9 |
+
- subleq
|
| 10 |
+
- topology
|
| 11 |
+
- braid-groups
|
| 12 |
+
- rsa
|
| 13 |
+
- ecdlp
|
| 14 |
+
- lean4
|
| 15 |
+
- smt
|
| 16 |
+
- forge-tournament
|
| 17 |
+
- sovereign
|
| 18 |
+
- snapkitty
|
| 19 |
+
- constraint-reverse-engineering
|
| 20 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 21 |
+
- other
|
| 22 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 23 |
+
- n<1K
|
| 24 |
+
pretty_name: From Sacred Geometry to Silicon — Forge Tournament Research Paper
|
| 25 |
+
---
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
# From Sacred Geometry to Silicon
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
**Reverse-Engineering Computational Constraints from Ancient Numerical Systems to Topological Cryptography**
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
A Forge Tournament Research Paper — SnapKitty West / SNAPKITTYWEST — 2026
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
---
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
## Summary
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
25-section, ~30-page LaTeX research paper investigating the thesis that radically different computational traditions can be compared through their treatment of **constraints, state, transformation, and representation**.
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
## Tournament Contestants
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
| Contestant | Domain |
|
| 42 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 43 |
+
| A: Ancient Numerical Systems | Babylonian base-60, accounting, astronomy |
|
| 44 |
+
| B: SUBLEQ | Single-instruction universality |
|
| 45 |
+
| C: Lambda Calculus | Symbolic substitution |
|
| 46 |
+
| D: Turing Machine | State + tape + transition |
|
| 47 |
+
| E: DAG Execution | Dependency ordering, deterministic scheduling |
|
| 48 |
+
| F: Formal Verification | Lean 4, SMT, zero-sorry proofs |
|
| 49 |
+
| G: Topological Computation | Braid groups, Yang-Baxter, anyons |
|
| 50 |
+
| H: Mobius Bridge | Experimental topological crypto framework |
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
**Winner: Formal Verification** (highest scores on precision, constraint transparency, cryptographic relevance)
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
## Central Thesis
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
The connection between ancient geometry, minimal machines, formal computation, and cryptography is **methodological**:
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
1. Represent the structure
|
| 59 |
+
2. Identify the constraints
|
| 60 |
+
3. Transform the representation
|
| 61 |
+
4. Execute the transformation
|
| 62 |
+
5. Verify the result
|
| 63 |
+
6. Measure what actually happened
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
## Evidence Standard
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
All claims are classified by evidence level (1=Conjecture through 7=Replicated). No cryptographic breaks are claimed without reproducible demonstration. Failed experiments are reported as valid results.
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
## Key Tables
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
- Computational paradigms comparison (8 paradigms x 5 properties)
|
| 72 |
+
- Mathematical concept to cybersecurity translation (15 concepts)
|
| 73 |
+
- RSA security assumptions
|
| 74 |
+
- ECDLP security assumptions
|
| 75 |
+
- Mobius Bridge component evidence classification
|
| 76 |
+
- Forge Tournament scoring (11 criteria x 8 contestants)
|
| 77 |
+
- Evidence classification (7 levels)
|
| 78 |
+
- Experimental reproducibility requirements
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
## Source
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
GitHub: https://github.com/SNAPKITTYWEST/forge-tournament-paper
|