Abstract
Manifold constraint hypothesis enables improved concept erasure by projecting updates onto estimated representation manifolds, achieving state-of-the-art results in nonlinear concept removal.
Concept erasure aims to remove a target concept from a representation while preserving the other information encoded in it. This is difficult because representations encode many concepts that are often correlated with the erasure target, so removing the target risks damaging them. We propose the Manifold Constraint Hypothesis (MCH): if natural representations concentrate on a structured, lower-dimensional manifold, then interventions should be constrained to that manifold and better preserve other information encoded in the representation during interventions. We instantiate MCH in a new concept erasure method: MANifold aware Concept Erasure (MANCE). MANCE performs iterative updates to the representations using signals from a classifier that predicts a target concept. We estimate the manifold using representations obtained from natural inputs, and then we project the concept removal update to the estimated manifold. We perform extensive evaluation on 119 settings spanning text and vision, including 13 language models, three NLP concepts, and 40 CelebA-CLIP attributes. Employing MANCE on top of previous methods shows consistent improved leakage results. We also introduce MANCE+ and MANCE++, which prepend a closed-form erasure algorithm before employing MANCE, achieving better leakage--surgicality tradeoffs relative to matched full-space updates. MANCE++, our best method, achieves state-of-the-art results on nonlinear concept erasure. These results support MCH in the erasure setting: interventions should be constrained to the natural representation manifold.
Community
TL;DR. It's the strongest method to remove concepts (e.g., gender, safety) from model's activations, while staying surgical with respect to collateral damage to other controlled concepts.
It also builds on a nice geometric hypothesis:
Hidden states produced by natural inputs do not fill the full representation space uniformly. We assume that they instead occupy a structured, lower-dimensional region shaped by the encoder and the data distribution, which we model as a manifold.
This leads us to propose the ππ’π―πͺπ§π°ππ₯ ππ°π―π΄π΅π³π’πͺπ―π΅ ππΊπ±π°π΅π©π¦π΄πͺπ΄ (πππ), among interventions with a matched effect on the target concept, manifold-constrained interventions preserve other concepts encoded in the representation better than unconstrained interventions.
We operationalize this hypothesis with a local first-order approximation of the manifold, using tangent directions obtained from natural inputs.
Across 119 settings (multiple model families, modalities and target concepts), MANCEβΊβΊ sets a new state of the art on concept erasure, while also improves prior erasers across most settings.
Nice!
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Erasing Without Collateral Damage: Precise Concept Removal in Diffusion Models (2026)
- Don't Forget Your Embeddings: Robust Knowledge Erasure via Precise Editing of Embeddings (2026)
- Concept Unlearning via Cross-Attention Activation Projection for Diffusion Models (2026)
- Where Pretraining writes and Alignment reads: the asymmetry of Transformer weight space (2026)
- Geometry-Adaptive Explainer for Faithful Dictionary-Based Interpretability under Distribution Shift (2026)
- Orthogonal Concept Erasure for Diffusion Models (2026)
- SPACE: Source-free Proxy Anchor Concept Erasure for MLLMs (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2607.03973 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper