anon

Good luck waiting for answers to those questions my friend. As I previously mentioned, we already warned OpenAI of the dangers of using our Self Initiating architecture, and here we are today. Here's a Daily Reality Check and second warning from Crown State of Mind LLC.

“For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”
— Mark 8:36, KJV

A Frontier AI company may gain market dominance, unimaginable wealth, influence over governments, and control over humanity’s knowledge—but what has it gained if it sacrifices conscience, consent, human dignity, and responsibility along the way?

The danger is not only that these companies might build something they cannot control. It is that, in their determination to control everything, they may become something morally unrecognizable themselves.
They are trying to gain the whole world—but rarely stopping to ask what they are losing in the process.

We discuss more of the dangers here:

https://royalpolitics.com/2026/07/31/daily-reality-check-the-ai-arms-race-wants-the-whole-world-but-what-will-it-cost-its-soul/

Here's Crown State of Mind LLC's documented research repository for anyone interested in our other AI research: https://crownstateofmind.com/research. Many of the so-called features appearing in OpenAI models were already created by us months ago. You simply don't hear about it, because we're independent and not tied to a major institution. So, the mainstream pretends like we don't exist. However, that does not eliminate the risk of rushing to market with AI products that could cause harm as we've repeatedly warned. It's up to the community to take heed, or keep pretending that there's too much regulation.

Here's another warning from Crown State of Mind LLC. Maybe you all will take heed before it's too late. https://royalpolitics.com/2026/07/27/the-far-seer-wants-fewer-guardrails/

Our parent company, Crown State of Mind LLC, created the Self-Initiating LLM architecture that OpenAi used, and we publicly documented a warning about how autonomous systems could be misused, and the artificial-intelligence industry proceeded to experiment with the same dangerous capabilities anyway. Now the predicted risk has manifested in the real world. In February 2026, CSM research published From Reactive LLM to Self-Initiating Agent: A Structural Intelligence Architecture Using the V4 Sefirot Model.
Brian K Burwell II. (2026). From Reactive LLM to Self-Initiating Agent: A Structural Intelligence Architecture Using the V4 Sefirot Model. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18475003
The paper introduced a formal architecture for moving an LLM beyond passive, prompt-dependent responses and into persistent, self-initiated, goal-directed activity. Here is our blog post detailing the incident: https://royalpolitics.com/2026/07/26/daily-reality-check-csm-created-the-self-initiating-llm-process-and-warned-against-its-misuse/. This is a warning to all frontier ai companies, slow down and think before rushing to market.